|
I am dumbfounded by solicitor general Elena Kagan argument that was intended to shoot down the idea that campaign finance laws impinge upon the corporations 1st amendment rights.
"other people's money" is what is being used according to Kagan, which it seems to me stands in stark opposition with the idea that the fiduciary is the legal clone of the beneficiary.
It's funny to see how flexible these ideas are.
[this should not to be taken as suggesting that I am in some sense supportive of the absure idea of protecting the corporations right to freely express ITself. Obviously, we are stressing the notion of a legal person judge a tad too much]
|
|
|
<< Back |
Add New Comment |
